#474: The Best Articles of 2024

Dear Readers,

Thank you for another great year. I’m grateful for your readership.

Now it’s time — for the 10th time! — to reveal my favorite articles of the year. In case you’re interested in how I chose them, the process was as follows:

  1. I looked back through every article over the past 49 issues

  2. I made a semifinalist list (see below), then re-read each article

  3. Then some magic happened where I chose my favorites (usually using my gut)

My very unscientific (yet robust!) way to select this year’s best articles.

I think you’ll appreciate my picks. For the first time ever, all three are personal essays. I don’t know if that speaks to a decline in traditionally reported journalism, or if the quality of personal essays has improved. Maybe it’s that I’m not looking hard enough in enough publications. Or maybe it’s just a trend in my personal reading tastes. Whatever it is, I stand behind my selections and urge you to (re)read them.

In addition to my three favorites, in this issue you’ll get:

  • The pet of the year

  • Your favorite article of the year

  • My favorite interview of the year

  • The author of the year

  • The issue of the year

Hope you enjoy today’s issue. If you do, let me know by writing a short note in the comments. I’d love to hear from you!

Leave a comment

Last thing: I’ll be taking the next two weeks off, as usual. I’m wishing you all a restful holiday with plenty of space to rest and read. (If you read anything great, let me know!) See you back here the first Thursday of 2025. 🎉

1️⃣ Letter From Home

Kiese Laymon: “I do not want to disappoint God, Mississippi, or home with this letter, but I have to disappoint God, Mississippi, and home with this letter. I am currently succumbing to evil.

“I do not believe in guns. I do not believe in prisons. I do not believe in killing. But in that moment, I wanted to kill that police officer and his family in about 16 different ways. And I partially wanted to kill him because he had less money than me.

“While I do not believe in guns, prisons, or killing, I wholly believe in the power of words to build, blur, humiliate, and destroy.

“I refuse to believe that the height of human being, which is really the act and art of being human, in this nation, is our capacity to kill, to incarcerate, to systemically humiliate, to discipline or to own people most efficiently. I believe that the height of human being in Mississippi, in New York, in Gaza, in Israel, in Sudan, everywhere on Earth, can be our ability to atone, restore, share, and vigorously accept when we have succumbed to evil.”

By Kiese Laymon • Bitter Southerner • 6 min • Gift Link

Read the article

2️⃣ Masculinity: The Abstract Rage To Protect

“There is a difference between a man’s sense of protection and a man’s sense of violence,” a male friend once reassured me. But I never could tell the difference.

When Amanda E. Machado tells men that she was once sexually assaulted at a festival, with her ex-boyfriend nearby but lost in the crowd, they instantly become ashamed of him. “How could he let this happen?” they ask. “He was supposed to protect you.”

In this enlightening essay, Ms. Machado explores notions of masculinity, weaving personal experiences with the work of Phil Christman, a lecturer at the University of Michigan. Mr. Christman writes, “When I try to nail down what masculinity is — what imperative gives rise to all this pain seeking and stoicism, this showboating asceticism and loud silence — I come back to this: Masculinity is an abstract rage to protect.”

The biggest problem with this “abstract rage to protect,” Ms. Machado argues, is that there is a fine line between a desire to protect and a desire to inflict violence. “The aggression men learn to protect the women they love, becomes exactly how they hurt the women they love.”

By Amanda E. Machado • The Adroit Journal • 15 mins • Gift Link

Read the article

Moby, who belongs to loyal readers Caitlin and Jason, is the 2024 Pet of the Year. An adventurous and loyal 14-year-old, Cody enjoys howling with sirens and scoring stale bread on neighborhood walks. Want your pet to appear here? hltr.co/pets

3️⃣ Athens, Revised

When she was 26, Erin Wood was on the last leg of a trip to Greece. On the afternoon before her flight, a man approached her, offered her a free tour of the Acropolis, a recommendation to a quality hotel, a meal, and a drink. Early the next morning, Ms. Wood woke up in her hotel bedroom, naked from the waist down, her body heavy, her sheets wet. “What have I allowed to happen?” she asked.

In this article, Ms. Wood explores the answer to that question. At first, she considers two versions of what happened. She writes two narratives. They both don’t feel right. Then, after unhelpful couples therapy with her unhelpful husband, she realizes that she’s been asking herself the wrong question. One night, unable to sleep, Ms. Wood reads an essay online about a woman who survived a serial killer. “What if I am not alone?” she asks. This new, revised question — it’s the one.

By Erin Wood • The Sun Magazine • 23 mins • Gift Link

Read the article

4️⃣ Reader’s Choice: The Friendship Problem

Rosie Spinks is a millennial mom living in London. This means we’re in no way alike. But the way she writes about friendship — it resonated deeply with me. And I have a feeling her essay will do the same with many of you.

Ms. Spinks explores what’s changed with modern friendships and why she feels less interested in making plans. It’s tiring, she writes:

It seems normal now that plans are made far in advance — scheduled around myriad travel and wedding weekends and kids and work commitments — and then canceled right before. Someone doesn’t follow up, or cancels and then never proposes an alternative plan. Similarly, promising new adult friendships never seem to blossom into the kind of quotidian check-ins and week-to-week ephemera that the friendship of our younger years is based on. Life-long friends make new life choices, drift apart. The friendship fizzles into WhatsApp volleys back and forth, and then someone doesn’t answer the last message, and then it’s a year before you ever talk again.

Has any of this happened to you? (For me, all of it.)

But instead of blaming motherhood, or the pandemic, or inflation, Ms. Spinks explores the “matrix of factors” that figure into the friendship burnout she’s experiencing. For guidance, she turns to Esther Perel (maybe we all should?), who explains that hyperconnectivity is to blame. “People have easily 1,000 virtual friends,” Dr. Perel says, “but no one they can ask to feed their cat.”

What to do, then? It’s time to remember our childhoods, Ms. Spinks suggests, especially as late-stage capitalism atomizes us into our lonely fiefdoms. It’s time to “play freely on the street.”

By Rosie Spinks • What Do We Do Now That We’re Here • 13 min • Gift Link

Read the article

💬 Other Bests and Favorites

➡️ Best Author: Beth McMurtrie
You know you’re pretty good when you get three articles published in Article Club in the same year. Even though I wasn’t too happy with education writing overall, I was very pleased with Ms. McMurtrie’s reporting and clear writing. She knows what people are talking about in education and how not to oversimplify or sensationalize. Check out “Is This The End of Reading?” “Customers in the Classroom,” and “Cheating Has Become Normal.” They’re all solid pieces.

➡️ Favorite Interview: Mike Hixenbaugh
It’s a privilege to get to interview such kind and generous authors, month after month. Every single conversation is thought provoking. But some interviews just click. That was the case with Mike Hixenbaugh, author (along with Antonia Hylton) of Southlake. I appreciated Mr. Hixenbaugh’s energy, his honesty, and his no-nonsense reporting. If you haven’t read his book, They Came for the Schools, it’s a great one. If you missed my interview with Mr. Hixenbaugh, here it is.

➡️ Best Issue
There’s a big debate happening at Article Club (at least among a few of you!) about which is better: (1) classic issues, where there’s a wide selection of articles about different topics, or (2) themed issues, where all the articles center on a common topic. This year’s best issue (and most popular) ended up being a themed issue, which explored the origins and impacts of misinformation. Here it is.

#470: Home Is Where The Misinformation Is

Mark Isero

November 14, 2024

Read full story

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. 😀

To our 21 new subscribers — including Katarzyna, Dion, Dori, Richard, Aubrey, Adam, Dominick, Stacey, Avni, Melissa, Renda, Brittany, Erin, Sara, Barbara, Myrtle, Susanne, and Basheer — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. Welcome to Article Club. Make yourself at home.

Paid subscribers, thank you for making Article Club a bestseller back in May. Your support is extremely appreciated.

If you appreciate the articles, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. I am very appreciative of Wanda, our latest paid subscriber. Thank you!

Subscribe

If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Symone!), leave a comment, buy me a coffee, or send me an email. I’d love to hear from you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you in 2025!

#473: Butter

Dear Loyal Readers,

It’s been a while since I’ve thanked those of you (300 this year!) who are new subscribers. So here I go: Thank you for discovering my newsletter and giving it a chance. I hope that you find some articles on race, education, and culture that are worthy of your time and attention. Always feel free to say hi.

I’m pleased with this week’s batch. As usual, I’ve chosen pieces from a variety of publications, many of which may not be in your normal rotation. (Paid subscribers make this possible, thank you!) Ever hear of Ecotone Magazine, for instance? It’s a good one.

Today’s lead article is “Butter,” a provocative essay by Mishele Maron that explores the inner workings of an eating disorder clinic. Rather than focusing on the physical and emotional therapy she received, Ms. Maron emphasizes the social dynamics among the patients, all young women. I think you’ll appreciate the piece’s tone as well.

If that topic is too heavy for you, I urge you to read one of the other three articles in this week’s issue. They are about:

Hope you appreciate this week’s articles. As always, if a piece resonates with you, let me know. I’d love to hear from you. Or if you prefer, show your support by becoming a paid subscriber (like Janice) or buying me a coffee (like Renée). I would be very grateful.

Subscribe

✚ Big thanks to Elise, Lillian, Bonnie, Wayne, Laura, Debra, Camille, Alison, and Nicole for joining our discussion of “Athens, Revised,” by Erin Wood, last Sunday. It was a wonderful, thought-provoking conversation. We won’t have a discussion in December, but I’ll let you know about our January article first thing in 2025. My hope is that if you’re maybe interested, you’ll give Article Club a try.

1️⃣ Butter

Instead of completing her freshman year at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington, Mishele Maron found herself one of eleven patients on the fifth floor of the Ballard Community Hospital’s eating disorder unit. Ms. Maron was there for bulimia; most of her peers were there for anorexia. In this well-written memoir, Ms. Maron recounts the relationships she experienced with her peers, particularly Beth, the leader of the girls, who mocked her for adding butter to her bread. “You’re going to eat that?” Beth asked increduously. Yes, in fact, despite the bullying, Ms. Maron was indeed going to eat the bread with butter. “I could not heal an eating disorder in five weeks,” Ms. Maron writes. “I could, however, eat the butter.”

By Mishele Maron • The Sun • 13 min • Gift Link

Read the article

2️⃣ My Father, The Cyborg

Even though I didn’t choose this piece as this week’s lead article, it’s still my favorite. Omer Rosen has an 89-year-old dad with the typical maladies of an 89-year-old dad. To keep his dad alive, and to protect him, and to alleviate his own anxiety and guilt, Mr. Rosen implements technology to monitor his father’s health. There are cameras to detect falls; there is a blood sugar monitor; there are wearables that gather all kinds of data. He likes that his dad is safe; however, with all this information, Mr. Rosen wonders if he’s being too controlling. Has he taken away his dad’s agency and his free will? Mr. Rosen writes: “The ability to make bad decisions is common to us all: it is only in the elderly that we perceive it as incompetence. In children, it is immaturity; in adults, it is recklessness; but in the elderly, it is a lack of capacity. When someone is under our care, we value their safety at the expense of their autonomy.”

By Omer Rosen • Boston Review • 17 min • Gift Link

Read the article

Here is Deery, who belongs to loyal readers Ben and Julie. Deery enjoys fall fashion. Want your pet to appear here? hltr.co/pets

3️⃣ The The The The

Brian Truong: “In third grade, I was trilingual but could not pronounce ‘the’ or ‘that’ properly. I found out when Mom came back from a parent-teacher conference and handed me Mrs. Johnson’s feedback slip from a language arts assessment.

“My gut twisted. It was not the first time someone assumed I was born outside of Texas. In the pecking order of my elementary school, ESL students were second-rate citizens. No one in my family had been through the American school system, but the message was clear: blend into the main group or be ostracized into the ‘other.’

“Without a semblance of opposition, our family converted to an English-only household.”

By Brian Truong • Ecotone Magazine • 3 min • Gift Link

Read the article

4️⃣ The Dark Future Of American Child Care

During and after the pandemic, child care in our country got better. That’s because our government invested in stricter requirements in licensing and safety training. A total of $24 billion in aid supported the rise of teacher salaries and ensured manageable child-to-caregiver ratios. Unfortunately a backlash followed, with conservatives slashing funding, believing that nuclear family members should take care of children, rather than the state. The result? Fewer rules and regulations, plus cost-cutting measures, like the employment of teenagers. Now teenagers as young as 14 are being employed by child care facilities — thereby reducing costs and resulting in more dangerous conditions. Preventing teenagers from caring for children, the argument goes, amounts to ageism. “You can’t say a 14-year-old is not going to be as good as a 65-year-old,” one state senator said.

By Jackie Mader • The Hechinger Report • 19 min • Gift Link

Read the article

💬 Your Turn: Say hi and share your perspective

Many of you are new to Article Club. Don’t be shy! Please feel free to introduce yourself, say hi, tell us why you subscribed to the newsletter, and share your perspective on one or more of the articles.

➡️ Which piece resonated with you and why?

In typical Article Club fashon, be sure to be kind and thoughtful. The idea here is always empathy and understanding.

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. 😀

To our 7 new subscribers — Mina, Eric, Ashley, Stardust, Jennifer, Rom, and Bmd — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. Welcome to Article Club. Make yourself at home.

If you appreciate the articles, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. I am very appreciative of Vanessa, our latest paid reader. Thank you!

Subscribe

If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Reginald!), leave a comment, buy me a coffee, or send me an email. I’d love to hear from you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT for our best-of-2024 issue.

#472: Writing With Compassion

Happy Thanksgiving, loyal readers.

I’m away on vacation, so today’s issue is going to be shorter than usual. I’m going to feature just one article and tell you why I liked it.

The piece is, “Teaching Lucy,” by Helen Lewis, published in The Atlantic.

If you’re an educator — and particularly, if you are a teacher of reading — you’ll recognize the subject of the article, Lucy Calkins. If you’re not familiar with Ms. Calkins, she used to be one of the most famous educators in the United States, with thousands of teachers using her methods of reading instruction. Then a few years ago, Ms. Calkins faced a backlash, spearheaded by a journalist named Emily Hanford (whom I interviewed in 2018), that challenged her approach, summarily canceling her and making her a pariah.

Typically I wouldn’t choose to share this type of article. After all, I’m not a big fan of the Reading Wars. I don’t enjoy following self-righteous educators, convinced that their way is the only way to teach all children, yelling at other educators and calling them dumb. In addition, I’m always nervous when The Atlantic publishes articles on education. They’re usually elitist in nature. And finally, most writing on education is not outstanding, so I tend to pass it up.

But writer Helen Lewis does a brilliant job here. She writes with compassion. I highly encourage you to read the piece, especially if you’re a parent or an educator.

How One Woman Became The Scapegoat For America’s Reading Crisis

For decades, Lucy Calkins was at the top of American education. She developed a reading curriculum, Units of Study, that believed that children learn best when taken seriously as meaning makers. Her approach — later called Balanced Literacy — combined direct phonics instruction with exposure to whole books that students chose based on their interests. Part of the point was to instill in young people a love of reading. For at least a generation, most children in the United States learned to read using Ms. Calkins’s method.

But over the last 10 years, a group of educators, cognitive scientists, and parents of children with dyslexia have blamed Ms. Calkins for what they call her irresponsible and unscientific approach to teaching reading. The reason our young people cannot read is that we’ve let Lucy teach them. They emphasize an approach called the Science of Reading, which focuses on direct phonics instruction. Children grow to love reading because they possess the skills to read proficiently. Leading this effort was Emily Hanford, a journalist who felt strongly that Ms. Calkins was doing a disservice to children. Her podcast, Sold a Story (featured here in 2022), galvanized the anti-Lucy movement, essentially canceling her and causing hundreds of school districts to abandon Units of Study.

In this well-written profile, Ms. Lewis examines this controversy, explains how Ms. Calkins fell from grace, and considers whether she can regain her good name.

By Helen Lewis • The Atlantic Monthly • 23 min • Gift Link

Read the article

From our hotel room in Seoul. It snowed!

💬 My Thoughts

First, my biases:

  • I’ve always worked with high school students. As much as I believe in the Science of Reading, I also know that direct phonics instruction cannot be the only approach with adolescents who struggle to read. By the time they’re teenagers, they’ve accumulated reading identities, based on their lived experiences, that are not easy to untangle.

  • Although on the one hand I appreciate the work of Emily Hanford to uncover the problems of Balanced Literacy, I always felt her reporting lacked nuance.

OK, with those caveats out of the way, it’s finally time for me to share why I appreciated this article so much. If you want an inside look, feel free to read my annotations as you follow along. Here are a few reasons:

1️⃣ Ms. Lewis recognizes and does not dismiss that the personal conflict between Ms. Calkins and Ms. Hanford was instrumental to this story
It is certainly true that there was a movement by thousands of educators to criticize Balanced Literacy and to uphold the Science of Reading as the best way to teach children to read. But Ms. Lewis accurately acknowledges that the attacks on Ms. Calkins were also personal, with Ms. Hanford leading the charge.

In Sold a Story, Ms. Hanford characterizes Ms. Calkins as out of touch. She is a privileged white woman, Ms. Hanford argues, whose beliefs stem from an esteemed New England childhood. Ms. Lewis expertly draws out this conflict, eliciting a defensive response from Ms. Calkins.

While making sure to note that Ms. Calkins did not indeed come from extravagant wealth, Ms. Lewis does not refrain from sharing details of her current lifestyle. Almost as important as the merits of the reading debate was Ms. Hanford’s depiction of Ms. Calkins as a snooty queen, aloof to criticism. In her writing, Ms. Lewis picks up on this populist trend in American education to vanquish an educational star. And the ultimate point was to win, by any means necessary — even if that meant publishing podcast after podcast that stated the same thing (there were many!).

2️⃣ However, Ms. Lewis broadens the scope of the reading controversy, making sure to explain the larger context
It would be easy for Ms. Lewis to focus exclusively on the conflict between Ms. Calkins and Ms. Hanford. Certainly, there is enough vitriol between the Balanced Literacy and the Science of Reading camps to fill many magazine pages. But instead of again fanning the flames, which would have been boring and annoying, Ms. Lewis takes a broader view, making sure we understand the recent Reading Wars in greater context.

In one passage, for example, Ms. Lewis zooms out, helping her reader realize that Americans have always wanted easy solutions to complex problems.

Later in the piece, Ms. Lewis spends significant space to explain another reason that the controversy became so heated — namely, that reading instruction became imbroiled in our post-pandemic culture wars. If you were a Lucy fan, you were a soft, out-of-touch progressive. If you were an advocate of the Science of Reading, you were an American patriot.

3️⃣ Most importantly, Ms. Lewis writes with compassion
Over the last 10 years of doing Article Club, perhaps the single most important thing I’ve looked for in writing is compassion. When I find a piece that includes nuance and humanity, I immediately gravitate toward it. This was one of those pieces.

In this article, Ms. Lewis does an extraordinary job helping the reader get to know Ms. Calkins. Not all of it is positive — like the references to the monogrammed towels, or this comparison of her cancellation to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001:

But then Ms. Lewis doesn’t give up on Ms. Calkins. There are stories from her childhood, for instance, as well as from the first decades of her career. There are also expressions of regret — and evidence that she is doing her best to listen to her critics and start anew. In short, Ms. Lewis offers us Ms. Calkins as a whole person, filled with faults as well as dreams. She’s stubborn, sure. But she’s also human, a regular person — and a bit scared. “I can’t retire,” she says, at 72 years old. “I don’t have any hobbies.”

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. 😀

To our 7 new subscribers — including Dan, Sam, Maura, and Preeti — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. Welcome to Article Club. Make yourself at home.

If you appreciate the articles, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. I am very appreciative of Nancy, our latest paid subscriber. Thank you!

Subscribe

If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Olissa!), leave a comment, buy me a coffee, or send me an email. I’d love to hear from you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#471: Screens Are Our Best Friends

Dear Loyal Readers,

Today’s issue is a sequel to last week’s newsletter. Last time, the articles explored the harms of misinformation among young people and our reticence to intervene. This time, I’ve selected four pieces about the impact of screens on our lives and how we complain about them — but how we ultimately have given up and given in.

You may think, “Mark, how is this a new topic? We all know that we’re addicted to our phones.” But this week’s collection goes beyond stating the obvious. It’s not just about the amount of time we spend on screens and our inability to change our habits. It’s about how screens have become our friends, our companions, our confidants. We’re merging with them. They’re an extension of ourselves. We’re becoming one. We’re creating a facsimile of reality, a matrix, perhaps a simultation. It’s possible that there’s no going back from The Singularity.

I hope you read one (or all four!) of these articles, then share your perspectives in the comments at the end of the newsletter. Here they are:

Hope you appreciate this week’s articles. As always, if a piece resonates with you, let me know. I’d love to hear from you. Or if you prefer, show your support by becoming a paid subscriber (like Isidore!). I would be very grateful.

Subscribe

✚ Last chance to join our discussion of “Athens, Revised” on December 1, 2:00 - 3:30 pm PT. Written by Erin Wood and published in The Sun, the article is equal parts devastating and uplifting. It’s raw and vulnerable. Throughout, it is brilliantly written. So far we have 11 people who have signed up, so there’s still room. You can find more info here and sign up here. Hope to see you there!

1️⃣ All The Little Data

Nicholas Carr: “I find myself in possession of a lot of information these days. I’m in the loop. I’m in many loops, all spinning simultaneously. It’s not just the minutiae of commerce — orders, shipments, deliveries—that are richly documented. When I’m driving, my car’s dashboard, linked to my iPhone through CarPlay, shows me exactly where I am, tells me the posted speed limit and the current traffic conditions, and lets me know both the distance I have to go before I reach my destination and the estimated time of my arrival. (There’s also a readout available on the town or city I’m visiting: population, elevation, square footage, GPS coordinates.) My phone’s weather app gives me a bespoke meteorological report of remarkable thoroughness. Right this second, the app tells me it’s eighty-four degrees and cloudy outside. A light rain will begin in seventeen minutes and will end forty-eight minutes after that, at which point it will become partly cloudy. The wind is blowing west-southwest at six miles per hour, the relative humidity is 58 percent, and the barometric pressure is 30.18 inHg. The UV index is six, which is High, and the air quality index is fifty-one, which is Moderate. The sun will set this evening at 8:11 p.m., and in four days the moon will be full. I’ve taken 4,325 steps today. My refrigerator’s water filter has only 10 percent of its useful life left. My credit rating just dropped eight points. I have 4,307 unread emails, two more than I had five minutes ago.”

By Nicholas Carr • The Hedgehog Review • 11 min • Gift Link

Read the article

2️⃣ The Therapist In The Machine

Jess McAllen: “The company Earkick provides an AI therapist in the form of a panda, and their mobile app offers a premium plan for $40 a year that lets you dress ‘Panda’ in accessories like a beret or fedora (the base option is free, for now). You can also choose your preferred personality for Panda.

“For the most part, the creators of AI therapeutic tools insist they are simply augmenting, not replacing, conventional mental health care. Stephan, from Earkick, frames AI as something that can be there when a real therapist is not. In fact, being always on call is integral to the Earkick ethos. Stephan explains, ‘I would have needed support when I was young, and in my dreams, [that support] was like a voice in my ear, that’s why it’s called Earkick: it’s a sidekick in the ear.’ ”

By Jess McAllen • The Baffler • 19 min • Gift Link

Read the article

MJ, who belongs to loyal readers Angelina and Clem, enjoys naps, treats, and sunbathing. Want your pet to appear here? hltr.co/pets

3️⃣ Schools vs. Screens

Luc Rinaldi: “This past September, on the first day of class, an Ontario high school teacher I’ll call Adam attended a school-wide meeting about the province’s new restrictions on students’ smartphones. He and his colleagues had heard lots of buzz about the new rules, which they felt were long overdue, but had little concrete information about how teachers on the frontlines would enforce them.

According to Adam, the previous school year had been a gong show. Students arrived every morning with phones out and AirPods in, bleary-eyed from late nights scrolling. They texted during the national anthem and played mobile games under their desks. They shared pictures and videos of each other, of teachers and of after-school fights. They coordinated mid-period vape breaks in group chats. One student went to the bathroom and returned with an Uber Eats delivery. Any time Adam wrote on the board, he’d turn back around to find students glued to their glowing screens. Engagement had plummeted, grades were declining and, because Adam was constantly policing students’ phone use, his bond with them was fraying. ‘These kids want to do well, but they’re so lost,’ says Adam.”

By Luc Rinaldi • Maclean’s • 18 min • Gift Link

Read the article

4️⃣ Cheating Has Become Normal

Beth McMurtrie: “It’s not AI that has a lot of professors worried. It’s what lies behind that willingness to cheat. While the reasons vary by student and situation, certain explanations surface frequently. Students are working long hours while taking full course loads.They doubt their ability to perform well. They arrive at college with weak reading and study skills. They don’t value the assignments they’re given. They feel like the only way they can succeed is to be perfect. They believe they will not be punished — or not punished harshly — if caught. And many, it seems, they don’t feel particularly guilty about it.

When it’s that widespread, it’s a culture. It’s not just an individual student. It is so many. And when I talk to some undergrads, they’re like, ‘Everybody does it.’

By Beth McMurtrie • The Chronicle of Higher Education • 14 min • Gift Link

Read the article

💬 Your Turn: What do you think?

➡️ Are you as doomsday about screens as these articles suggest we should be?
➡️ Which article scared you most (or maybe none of them)?
➡️ What can we do (for ourselves, for our families, for our friends, for our communities) in order to stem the tide?

Tip: Be sure to refer to at least one article in your response.

In typical Article Club fashon, be sure to be kind and thoughtful. The idea here is always empathy and understanding.

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. 😀

To our 7 new subscribers — including Angelina, Zoe, Ashok, Kieren, and Alison — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. Welcome to Article Club. Make yourself at home.

If you appreciate the articles, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. I am very appreciative of Ulysses, our latest paid reader. Thank you!

Subscribe

If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Quince!), leave a comment, buy me a coffee, or send me an email. I’d love to hear from you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#470: Home Is Where The Misinformation Is

Dear Loyal Readers,

We blame Big Tech, social media, and their algorithms for many of our society’s problems. Case in point (according to Jonathan Haidt): The reason our kids are messed up is because of their phones. There’s misinformation and the attention economy and Andrew Tate and misogyny on TikTok. All of this might be true. But why aren’t we (we meaning parents and educators) doing anything about it?

Have we given up? Or even worse, Are we part of the problem?

Today’s issue includes four articles that explore the common theme of misinformation and its effects on young people. On purpose, I’m being provocative, suggesting that this misinformation not only exists “out there” but also from within. Too often, our own lack of critical thinking — as well as our inability to talk deeply with our teenagers about their lives online — has meant relegating our young people to fend for themselves against a big, unadulterated, confusing, toxic cyberworld.

My hope is that you’ll read one or more of the following articles, then share your perspectives with our kind, thoughtful reading community. Here they are:

Hope you appreciate this week’s articles. As always, if a piece resonates with you, let me know. I’d love to hear from you. Or if you prefer, show your support by becoming a paid subscriber (like Hank!). I would be very grateful.

Subscribe

✚ You’re invited to join our discussion of “Athens, Revised” on December 1, 2:00 - 3:30 pm PT. Written by Erin Wood and published in The Sun, the article is equal parts devastating and uplifting. It’s raw and vulnerable. Throughout, it is brilliantly written. So far we have 10 people who have signed up, so there’s still room. You can find more info here and sign up here. Hope to see you there!

1️⃣ Is Sleep Training Harmful?

The answer is no. But that’s if you believe in scientific research. Many of us, though, base our parenting decisions on Instagram profiles, Reddit subreddits, articles we read online, and books with snazzy titles. In this outstanding multimedia presentation, Tom Vaillant explains with visualizations how misinformation spreads because we tend to believe what we already believe, consuming sources easily available to us. After all, it’s easier to follow an Instagram influencer who says that sleep training will kill your baby’s brain cells than it is to read the literature reviews and the clinical studies, nearly 100% of which conclude otherwise.

By Tom Vaillant • The Pudding • 10 min • Gift Link

Read the article

2️⃣ Why Everyone Has Peanut Allergies

In 1999, 0.6 percent of American children had a peanut allergy. Their reactions were mostly mild. Then the numbers began to surge. Now the rate is almost 3 percent. And the effects are more often life threatening. What caused the rate and severity to shift?

The reason was an abundance of caution and a strongly worded recommendation by an authoritative organization published in a well-regarded medical journal. In 2000, the American Academy of Pediatrics told parents not to feed their children peanuts in any form until they turned 3. “Remember 1-2-3,” author Terry Murphy writes. “Age 1: start milk. Age 2: start eggs. Age 3: start peanuts.”

The problem was, there was no scientific basis for this guidance. For pediatricians (and therefore, parents) who followed the advice, it was better to be safe than sorry. After all, who wants to kill your kid just because peanut butter is delicious? Problem was, the recommendation created a vicious cycle. Ms. Murphy writes, “The more prevalent peanut allergies became, the more people avoided peanuts for young children. This, in turn, caused more peanut allergies. Tunnel-vision thinking had created a nightmare scenario for which the only possible solution seemed to be the total eradication of peanuts from the planet.”

By Terry Murphy • The Harvard Gazette • 10 min • Gift Link

Read the article

Wayne, who belongs to loyal reader Clare, is very scary in his Halloween costume. Want your pet to appear here? hltr.co/pets

3️⃣ Can AI Be Blamed For A Teen’s Suicide?

You may have heard about this sad, tragic story. In many ways, 14-year-old Sewell Setzer III was a typical teenager. He liked Formula 1 racing and playing Fortnite with his friends. Like many young people, he did his best to navigate the challenges of growing up. But instead of opening up to his family, or building new friendships with his classmates, Sewell fell in love with a chatbot on the app Character.AI. Then one night, Sewell killed himself after his make-belief girlfriend told him to come home, “my sweet king.”

This article made me feel sick. First of all, I cannot imagine what Megan L. Garcia, Sewell’s mother, is going through. (She is suing the company.) In addition, I can’t stand that these apps are being marketed to teenagers as a solution to their loneliness. (Thirteen-year-olds can join.) One founder said, “It’s going to be super, super helpful to a lot of people who are lonely or depressed.” The other said that he founded the company for “fun.”

By Kevin Roose • The New York Times • 13 min • Gift Link

Read the article

4️⃣ The New Wave of Right Wing Eco-Supremacists

I saved the best (and the most disturbing) article for last. Most of us think that climate change activism comes mostly from the progressive left, that conservatives have deemed the phenomenon a hoax fabricated by the government. No longer, argues Abrahm Lustgarten in this well-written, fascinating piece.

Over the past several years, there has been a trend among young men, radicalized to the far right by YouTube and social media, who believe in climate change acceleration and blame undocumented immigrants for its impact. The man who killed 23 people in El Paso in 2019 wrote, “If we can get rid of enough people, then our way of life can become more sustainable.” The man who killed 10 people in Buffalo in 2022 did so in the pursuit of “green nationalism.” It’s a perverse but growing subset of the great replacement theory, once known only on 4chan’s message boards, but now amplified, largely unchecked, in mainstream media.

By Abrahm Lustgarten • ProPublica • 30 min • Gift Link

Read the article

💬 Your Turn: What do you think?

➡️ Can parents and educators fight against the authority of the algorithm? If so, how?

Tip: Be sure to refer to at least one article in your response.

In typical Article Club fashon, be sure to be kind and thoughtful. The idea here is always empathy and understanding.

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. 😀

To our 8 new subscribers — including Alison, Abba, Angela, Rachel, and Uzair — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. Welcome to Article Club. Make yourself at home.

If you appreciate the articles, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. I am very appreciative of Sally, our latest paid reader. Thank you!

Subscribe

If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Oakley!), leave a comment, buy me a coffee, or send me an email. I’d love to hear from you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

A holiday gift for you

Photo by Wilhelm Gunkel on Unsplash. (It’s a German typewriter!)

Dear Paid Subscribers,

Thank you for supporting me and Article Club with your hard-earned cash.

I’d like to send you a gift this holiday season to thank you for your support.

You might not know this (and you might find it a little strange), but for the past 10 years, I’ve automatically saved every article I’ve read. The program that does the saving says I’ve read 43,000 articles.

Which led me to an idea: What if I emailed you a personalized article, just for you, based on a topic of your choice?

If you like this idea, here’s what to do. You have two choices:

  • Email me. Say hi, then tell me a few topics you’d enjoy.

  • Leave me a voicemail at ‪(415) 323-6532‬. Say hi, then tell me a few topics you’d enjoy.

I look forward to this experiment! (It is also giving me other ideas for paid subscribers, but more about that in the New Year.)

Hope you have a great week ahead, and thank you again for your readership,

Mark

#469: Farewell, America

Dear Readers,

I’ve been doing this newsletter for almost 10 years. If you’ve been here for a while, you know that I typically don’t comment on presidential elections. Instead, I spend time looking for great articles, and then I let the articles do the talking. That’s the whole point of Article Club. Together we read and discuss the best articles on race, education, and culture, kindly and thoughtfully, in order to expand our empathy.

The problem with publishing every Thursday is that every four years, there’s an issue that goes out two days after the presidential election. That’s not enough time for nuanced, well-written articles to emerge. Right now, it’s all hot takes. You’ve likely been reading these. They’re filled with fury, or fear, or delight, or despair. These pieces have a place, no doubt. But I’ve always shied away from including them here. I prefer to share articles that have had a little time for perspective.

That’s why this week I’m featuring an article that is eight years old. I found it in Issue #67, “White Won,” published in November 2016, way back when this newsletter was called Iserotope Extras. The piece is called “Farewell, America,” by Neal Gabler.

I encourage you to read the article. Here’s what I wrote about it at the time:

In case you want to wallow in despair, check out this article, which argues that the election killed America — our values, what we stand for, our place in the world. Except as I read this piece, I wondered how much of the American myth is just like any other country’s myth — important, of course, but really just a story, one that we can construct anew.

Read the article

When I re-read the piece a few days ago, I was struck by how prescient it was. What people are saying now, Prof. Gabler was saying in 2016. It’s a little eerie, actually.

For example, here is how Prof. Gabler begins the piece:

Re-reading this passage got me thinking: If you cross out “Nov. 8, 2016” and replace it with “Nov. 5, 2024,” would anyone be able to tell? Prof. Gabler’s words eight years could easily have been written in yesterday’s newspapers.

The same can be said for Prof. Gabler’s prediction for the future:

Even before the Dobbs decision, Prof. Gabler understands that misogyny is on the way. Even before President Trump’s promise of mass deportation, he points out the xenophobia and nativism in our country. Most importantly, Prof. Gabler emphasizes the “white sense of grievance” bellowing from men. Pundits writing about Tuesday’s election comment on this phenomenon as if it’s fairly new. Not a chance, Prof. Gabler would argue. It’s old by now.

Finally, I was surprised by how well Prof. Gabler captured the severity of the time. There is no sugar coating. In stark prose, he makes sure to tell us that “we won’t survive unscathed” because “we know too much about each other to heal.”

Even his point that “democracy only functions when its participants abide by certain conventions” rings true. Prof. Gabler seems to predict the rightward shift in the American electorate years before other political commentators. In this piece, it’s clear that he doesn’t buy into a false progressive hope that people’s consciences would lead them to vote for now-outdated American values.

Re-reading Prof. Gabler’s article certainly didn’t make me feel hopeful. It cemented my sense that we are intractably stuck as a country. But I did find his piece still very relevant today. I hope you read it and tell me what you think.

💬 Your Turn: What do you think?

➡️ Is Prof. Gabler’s piece still relevant today? What’s the same? What’s changed?

If you’re comfortable, please share your experience. In typical Article Club fashon, be sure to be kind and thoughtful!

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you appreciated it. 😀

⭐️In case you didn’t see last week’s issue, I warmly invite you to our discussion of “Athens, Revised,” by Erin Wood. We are meeting on Sunday, Dec. 1, at 2 pm PT. Here is more information (including an interview with the author), and you can sign up here. Thank you to the eight of you who have signed up so far.

To our 10 new subscribers — including Aayda, TC, William, JH, Corinne, Hamza, Abigail, Staci, and Alice — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. Welcome to Article Club. Make yourself at home.

If you appreciate the articles, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. I am very appreciative of Tyler, our latest paid reader. Thank you!

Subscribe

If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Orianna!), leave a comment, buy me a coffee, or send me an email. I’d love to hear from you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#468: Let’s discuss “Athens, Revised”

Dear Loyal Readers,

Happy Halloween! I wish you successful tricking and treating. In case this needs to be said, 100 Grand is the best candy bar. (It used to be Twix.) Thank you.

Now let’s get to this month’s featured article. But before that:

  • If you’re a newish subscriber: Since January 2020, I’ve chosen one article every month for a deep dive. Folks who are interested read it, annotate it, and discuss it. The author generously records a podcast interview. It’s been fun.

If you’ve never participated (that is to say, most of you), you’re invited. We’re a kind, thoughtful reading community. I think you’ll enjoy it.

All right, let’s get down to business. I’m excited to announce this month’s article: “Athens, Revised.” Written by Erin Wood and published in The Sun, the article is equal parts devastating and uplifting. It’s raw and vulnerable. Throughout, it is brilliantly written.

Here’s what you can expect in today’s issue:

  • My blurb about this month’s article

  • A short biography about the author

  • A podcast interview with the author

  • What you need to do if you’d like to participate

Are you already confident that you’d like to join? We’re meeting up on Sunday, Dec. 1, 2:00 - 3:30 pm PT. All you need to do is click on the button below and sign up. 📖

Sign up for our discussion on Dec. 1

Athens, Revised

When she was 26, Erin Wood was on the last leg of a trip to Greece. On the afternoon before her flight, a man approached her, offered her a free tour of the Acropolis, a recommendation to a quality hotel, a meal, and a drink. Early the next morning, Ms. Wood woke up in her hotel bedroom, naked from the waist down, her body heavy, her sheets wet. “What have I allowed to happen?” she asked.

In this article, Ms. Wood explores the answer to that question. At first, she considers two versions of what happened. She writes two narratives. They both don’t feel right. Then, after unhelpful couples therapy with her unhelpful husband, she realizes that she’s been asking herself the wrong question. One night, unable to sleep, Ms. Wood reads an essay online about a woman who survived a serial killer. “What if I am not alone?” she asks. This new, revised question — it’s the one.

By Erin Wood • The Sun Magazine • 23 mins • Gift Link

Read the article

✚ If you read Amanda E. Machado’s “The Abstract Rage To Protect,” June’s article of the month, this piece is a perfect complement.

⭐️ About the author

Erin Wood writes, edits, and publishes from her home in Little Rock, Arkansas, and is a native Arkansan.

Erin owns and runs Et Alia Press, a “small press for big voices,” publishing award-winning adult nonfiction and children’s books with strong ties to Arkansas. She provides publishing advice, editing, and coaching for creative writers, and loves helping businesses and nonprofits share their stories.

Erin’s book, Women Make Arkansas: Conversations with 50 Creatives, was a silver medalist for “Best Nonfiction South” from the Independent Publisher Book Awards (IPPYs) and was featured at the 2019 Arkansas Literary Festival.

Erin’s work has been anthologized and is forthcoming or has appeared in The Sun, HuffPost Personal, River Teeth’s “Beautiful Things,” Scary Mommy, Catapult, The Rumpus, Ms. Magazine's Blog, Psychology Today, and elsewhere, and has been a notable in Best American Essays and nominated for a Pushcart Prize.  

⭐️ About the interview

I’m always deeply appreciative that authors agree to do an interview for Article Club. It’s a gift that they share with us their process, their craft, and their perspective. Thank you, Ms. Wood, for saying yes to participating in our reading community!

I’m also grateful that loyal reader and co-host Melinda generously agreed to facilitate the conversation with Ms. Wood. I feel the interview was richer as a result.

In the interview, Melinda and Ms. Wood discussed a number of topics, including:

  • how the essay originated in 2008 when Ms. Wood was in graduate school, and how the piece transformed through the support of three writing groups

  • how Ms. Wood captured the haziness and disconnection she felt waking up the morning after surviving the sexual assault

  • how meeting Natalie helped Ms. Wood feel less shame and less alone because of the power of sharing their stories and rewriting their traumatic experiences

  • how women deserve opportunities to revise their own narratives

I encourage you to listen to the interview if you have the time. Thank you!

🙋🏽‍♀️ Interested? Here’s what’s next.

You are certainly welcome to read the article, listen to the interview, and call it a day. But if you’re intrigued, if you’re interested, you might want to discuss this article in more depth with other kind, thoughtful people.

If you sign up, I’ll be sure to get you all the info you need, including the Zoom link and what you can expect from the discussion.

If this will be your first time participating in Article Club, I’m 100% sure you’ll find that you’ll feel welcome. We’re a kind, thoughtful reading community.

What do you think? Interested? All you need to do is sign up below. Or reach out with all of your questions.

Sign up for our discussion on December 1

Thank you for reading and listening to this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. 😀

To all of our 8 new subscribers — including Everette, PD, Janet, Mary, and Isabella — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Keith! Kevin! Konstance!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Yolanda, thank you for getting the word out.

If you appreciate these interviews, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of incessantly scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. (Big thanks to Robbie, Article Club’s latest paid subscriber.)

Subscribe

If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Oz!), leave a comment, send me an email, or send me a voicemail. I’d like to hear from you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#467: White Lines

Dear Readers,

One rule I have for my life is, “Never read the comments.” It has served me well. There’s enough stress in my day; I don’t need to entertain more. But over the past two weeks, as I’ve read the comments section here, I’ve had a change of heart, at least for this publication. It has been wonderful to read the thoughtful commentary from kind readers who care deeply about the best writing out there. Thank you, I hope it continues, and if you’d like to share your perspective, please do.

Leave a comment

Now let’s get to this week’s articles. In typical Article Club fashion, they run the gamut from racism at recess to the purpose of college to the benefits of veganism.

I highly recommend this week’s lead article, “White Lines.” Author Emilio Carrero recounts his early-2000s Florida childhood playing pick-up soccer games at recess, in a masterful and thought-provoking coming-of-age essay. “For me,” Mr. Carrero writes, “nothing made as much sense as those twenty minutes in the sweltering heat, where the sun-scorched grass and the white chalk lines and the orange cones all existed to explain an otherwise confusing world — my brownness and poorness, the color line that we all danced along, a history as scuffed and dirtied as our clothes and shoes, and the daily rituals of unity, a rigged contest, its outcome as inevitable as the victory of whiteness.”

If personal essays aren’t for you, I invite you to read:

Hope you enjoy this week’s articles. As always, if a piece hits you, let me know. I’d love to hear from you. Or if you prefer, show your support by becoming a paid subscriber (like Giselle!). I would be very grateful.

Subscribe

1️⃣ White Lines

Emilio Carrero lives for recess. It’s the time when he and his fellow 10-year-old friends play soccer on the big field of his elementary school in Florida. Except he doesn’t much like soccer, nor is he very good at the sport. What thrills Emilio is winning — because winning means he is saved from his poorness, from his Brownness, from his peers making fun of the house he used to live in, before it was foreclosed.

But winning might also mean being accepted by his white peers. After all, Emilio, a Puerto Rican boy growing up after 9/11, has been taught to be patriotic. It’s important that there’s unity against the enemy, he’s been told, and unity takes sacrifice. “I hoped that recess would bring me closer to being truly American,” he writes, even if that means hating his brown skin.

Then one day, the white kids change the rules. Max, “with a snarl on his lips, his blond hair as white as the sun,” chooses both teams. The teams are segregated by race. Emilio and his Brown and Black friends have no chance against their white classmates. That is, until Emilio finds a way out of this trap.

By Emilio Carrero • The Sun • 16 min • Gift Link

Read the article

💬 Your Turn: What do you think?

➡️ Growing up, did you have any “white lines?”

In other words: Were there rules in your childhood — overt or otherwise — based on race, in which you internalized and acted on those rules (no matter your race)? Did you play by those rules, or did you rebel?

If you’re comfortable, please share your experience. In typical Article Club fashon, be sure to be kind and thoughtful!

Leave a comment

Cali, who belongs to loyal reader Millie, enjoys taking weekend trips to Las Vegas in order to watch ESPN with her favorite human friend, Lisa (also a loyal reader). Want your pet to appear here? hltr.co/pets

2️⃣ Why College, Or What Have We Done?

The noblest question in the world, Benjamin Franklin once asked, is, “What good may I do in it?” Prof. Jonathan Zimmerman, who teaches at the University of Pennsylvania, which Mr. Franklin founded, wishes nostalgically that today’s students would still consider this question in earnest.

But that reality, he argues, is no longer. The point of college has become, he argues, “to get ahead, and to win the game.” This means getting good grades, telling the professor what they want to hear, getting accepted into the most elite co-curricular activities, and applying for lucrative jobs in finance, even though those jobs are awful. In other words: The goal of college is not to do good but rather to dominate.

Prof. Zimmerman writes:

The big problem at college is not political correctness, or wokeness, or racism, or antisemitism. The big problem is cynicism, spawned by an institution that tells young people one thing and does the opposite. If we truly believed our rhetoric about individual exploration and collective uplift, we would structure college in a very different fashion. But we don’t believe it and the students know it. They have found us out.

By Jonathan Zimmerman • Liberties Journal • 19 min • Gift Link

Read the article

3️⃣ Confessions Of A Former Carnivore

Many of us believe that education will set us down the right path, and that the truth will set us free. Except most of us — at least 96 percent of Americans — still eat meat, even though we know we shouldn’t.

In this well-researched, well-written article, writer Aaron Gell gets right to it:

Having adopted a vegan diet myself just a few years ago, following decades of blissful unconcern and another few years of guilty but defiant self-indulgence, I’ve found myself increasingly mystified by our culture’s intractable attachment to using animals for food. Why, given the growing plethora of decent alternatives and the many reasons to forswear meat, dairy, and, yes, seafood — self-evidently good reasons, involving ethics, personal health, environmental devastation, and social justice — aren’t more of us doing it? Why are so many otherwise thoughtful, conscientious, and deeply caring individuals so willing to cause so much suffering for the most trifling and transient of gratifications?

I especially appreciated Mr. Gell’s discussion of the “4 Ns” — false claims that flesh eaters (like me) cling to, even though we know we’re deluding ourselves. Here they are. If you haven’t gone vegan, which one is your nemesis?

  • Meat is necessary: Where else will we get protein?

  • Meat is natural: What do you think cavemen ate?

  • Meat is nice: I could never live without cheese!

  • Meat is normal: If everyone is eating meat, it must be OK!

By Aaron Gell • The New Republic • 24 min • Gift Link

Read the article

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. 😀

To our 14 new subscribers — including Eugene, Paul, Dara, Lianna, Neil, Eliza, Claudia, Helen, Kamal, and Lise — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. Welcome to Article Club. Make yourself at home.

If you appreciate the articles, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. I am very appreciative of Randy, our latest paid reader. Thank you!

Subscribe

If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Niphania!), leave a comment, buy me a coffee, or send me an email. I’d love to hear from you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#466: The Feminist

Dear Readers,

Thank you for your kind words and thoughtful comments about last week’s issue. My intent was not to disparage the author but rather to highlight the piece’s weaknesses in argumentation. Several of you said you appreciated seeing how I read and annotate. No promises, but maybe I’ll do this again in an upcoming issue — that is to say, if a piece moves me so.

This week, let’s get back to classic Article Club — in which I scour the Internet and bring you four great articles, from a variety of publications, on race, education, and culture. Today’s lead piece is a short story, “The Feminist,“ by Tony Tulathimutte. Honestly, I’ve never read anything quite like it. In short, the story is about a white man with feminist politics who wonders why he can’t find a woman to date. My feelings while reading the piece ran the gamut. When should my compassion for the main character begin and end? What’s the line between cluelessness and creepiness?

If you’d like to steer clear of anything resembling incel energy, I’ve included three other pieces for you in this week’s issue. They are about:

Hope you enjoy this week’s articles. As always, if a piece hits you, let me know. I’d love to hear from you. Or if you prefer, show your support by becoming a paid subscriber (like Frances!). I would be very grateful.

Subscribe

1️⃣ The Feminist

Tony Tulathimutte: “If you ask him where he went to high school, he likes to boast that, actually, he went to an all-girls school. That was sort of true — he was one of five males at a progressive private school that had gone co-ed just before he’d enrolled. People always reply: Ooh la la, lucky guy! You must’ve had your pick. Which irritates him, because it implied women would only date him if there were no other options, and because he hadn’t dated anyone in high school. One classmate junior year had a crush on him, but he wasn’t attracted to her curvaceous body type so felt justified in rejecting her, just as he’d been rejected many times himself.

“The women he tries to date offer him friendship instead, so once again, most of his friends are women. This is fine: it’s their prerogative, and anyway, lots of relationships begin platonically — especially for guys with narrow shoulders. But soon a pattern emerges. The first time, as he is leaving his friend’s dorm room, he surprises himself by saying: Hey, this might be super random, and she can totally say no, but he’s attracted to her, so did she want to go on a ‘date’ date, sometime? In a casual and normal voice. And she says, ‘Oh,’ and filibusters — she had no idea he felt that way, and she doesn’t want to risk spoiling the good thing they have by making it a thing, she just wants to stay . . . and he rushes to assure her that it’s valid, no, totally valid, he knows friendship isn’t a downgrade, sorry for being weird. Ugh!

“Right? she replies, dating’s so overrated and meaningless in college anyway, and she knows that he knows he’ll find someone who deserves him, because he’s great, really great, so thoughtful, so smart, not like these SAE sideways-hat-wearing dudebros, but of course he already knows that, and she really appreciates it. Then he thanks her for being honest, because it’s proof their friendship is real, and don’t worry about him, he gets it.”

By Tony Tulathimutte • n + 1 • 29 min • Gift Link

Read the article

✚ Check out this recent profile of Mr. Tulathimutte in The New York Times. It also discusses his new book, Rejection, a collection of seven connected short stories.

💬 Your Turn: What do you think?

What did you think of this guy? What did you think of this piece?

I’d love to hear your thoughts and get a conversation going in the comments.

➡️ Did you have compassion for the main character? Or, like me, did you draw a line?
➡️ Did you find the main character clueless or creepy, or something else?

In typical Article Club fashon, be sure to be kind and thoughtful!

Leave a comment

Wade, who belongs to loyal readers Jonathan and Todd, is currently very focused on vigorously rolling around in recently fertilized grass. In his middle age, Wade has given up his passionate wild turkey chases. He enjoys sun tanning on the front porch. Want your pet to appear here? hltr.co/pets

2️⃣ Letter From Home

Kiese Laymon: “I do not want to disappoint God, Mississippi, or home with this letter, but I have to disappoint God, Mississippi, and home with this letter. I am currently succumbing to evil.

“I refuse to believe that the height of human being, which is really the act and art of being human, in this nation, is our capacity to kill, to incarcerate, to systemically humiliate, to discipline or to own people most efficiently. I believe that the height of human being in Mississippi, in New York, in Gaza, in Israel, in Sudan, everywhere on Earth, can be our ability to atone, restore, share, and vigorously accept when we have succumbed to evil.”

By Kiese Laymon • Bitter Southerner • 6 min • Gift Link

Read the article

3️⃣ They didn’t like The Atlantic article on reading, either

Turns out, it wasn’t just me who disliked The Atlantic’s viral article on reading, which lamented that elite college students have difficulty finishing books. By the looks of last week’s comments section, several of you didn’t much like it, either.

Big thanks to loyal readers Caroline, Debra, and Knitwish, who sent these thoughtful pieces my way. The first is by an English teacher interviewed for the piece. The second is a well-written rant with analysis similar to mine.

The Atlantic Did Me Dirty
By Carrie M. Santo-Thomas • Personal Substack • 9 min • Gift Link

Carrie M. Santo-Thomas: “[Rose] Horowitch’s article reflects a frighteningly narrow definition of what constitutes worthwhile literature. Passing references to Moby Dick, Crime and Punishment, and even my unit about The Odyssey, confine literary merit to a very small, very old, very white, and very male box. As a staunch advocate for diverse and representative literature, I was immediately curious about the actual texts at the center of this ‘crisis’ so I asked Horowitch directly what types of books were the sticking points in her professor friends’ curricula. Unsurprisingly, it was canonical classics. As Horowitch points out, I am just ’one public-high school teacher in Illinois,’ but while professors at elite universities sound the alarm over Gen Z undergrads not finishing Les Miserables because they are uninterested in reading a pompous French man drone on for chapters about the Paris sewer system, my colleagues and I have developed professional toolboxes with endless other ways to inspire our students to read about justice, compassion, and redemption.”

Rose Horowitch And The Obsession With Belief Over Empiricism
By Chad Post • Three Percent • 6 min • Gift Link

Chad Post: “This argument is a perfect exemplar of today’s op-ed obsessed content economy: Is it true? WHO KNOWS! But does it sound plausible? Does it give you something to rail against? FOR SURE. It’s Thanksgiving dinner fodder: ‘Kids sure are dumb these days. They can’t even read all of Crime and Punishment!’ (‘Generally, they only read “Crime” ‘ is the most appropriate response.)"

“I do want to point out that NOT A SINGLE STUDENT was interviewed for this piece. Instead, it’s all anecdotal stuff that professors would say at a cocktail party for laughs and so that everyone could commiserate over how ‘teaching is so much harder now, because students are dumber.’ ”

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. 😀

To our 5 new subscribers — including Cassie, Kaiti, Jordan, and Sara — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. Welcome to Article Club. Make yourself at home.

If you appreciate the articles, value our discussions, and in general have come to trust that Article Club will have better things for you to read than your current habit of scrolling the Internet for hours on end, please consider a paid subscription. I am very appreciative of Quince, our latest paid reader. Thank you!

Subscribe

If subscribing is not your thing, don’t despair: There are other ways you can support this newsletter. Recommend the newsletter to a friend (thanks Mindy!), leave a comment, buy me a coffee, or send me an email. I’d love to hear from you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe below. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.