#352: The Only Way to Defeat Gadgets Is To Ban Them

One of my goals this summer is to become less addicted to my phone. ☎ Safe to say, I haven’t succeeded — yet. After all, making goals is easier than reaching them.

Or maybe I’m not the problem? Maybe the endeavor is impossible, given how technology works, unless I escape from the network entirely?

That seems to be the message of this week’s lead article, “The Medium Is the Menace.” Futurist Andrey Mir argues that as long as we keep clicking and swiping, there’s becoming no real distinction between “the real world” and “the digital world.” We’re just an extension of the machine. We can say that we’re getting off Instagram and Facebook (or TikTok, my favorite) to seek moderation or a digital detox, but ultimately we’re fooling ourselves.

Are you making progress in maintaining your humanity in the face of the inexorable advances of technology? If so, please share your tips and your wisdom!

Leave a comment

Also in this week’s issue:

  • Listen to an interview with Vann R. Newkirk II, author of this week’s Article Club selection, “When the Myth of Voter Fraud Comes for You”

And away we go! I hope you enjoy this week’s issue. If an article, or the interview, or maybe the pet photo resonates with you, please reach out. I’d love to hear from you!

Leave a voice message

The Medium Is the Menace

When we find ourselves checking our email, or doomscrolling Twitter, or texting a friend, or playing Wordle, or reading this newsletter (you get the idea), “we’re not just spending time on the Internet,” writes media futurist Andrew Mir in this thoughtful essay. Rather, “we’re investing time in its improvement.”

In other words, we’re performing labor.

For all our time online, we gain convenience, connection, and access. But “all this labor is changing us,” Mr. Mir writes, altering our physical skills, our brain’s physiology, and our expectations of time and space.

But Mark, you say, we already know this! Tell us something new.

That something new is that there’s no real way out. Moderation isn’t the answer. There’s no such thing as moderation. Every time we check our phone, we’re withdrawing ever farther from the physical world. Mr. Mir writes:

The transition from the physical world to the digital world is happening with astonishing rapidity. The shift from nomadic to sedentary culture took millennia; the migration from villages to cities took centuries; the resettling onto the Internet will take about 70 years.

If digital world demands our attention, the only sensible answer is to flee and to spend our time elsewhere, deeply in the physical world. “Media literacy is, first and foremost, time management. Media literacy is the ability not to use media,” Mr. Mir writes. He adds, “The only way to defeat gadgets in the fight for attention is to ban them.”

Maybe we’re too far gone. Maybe it’s too late for us, Mr. Mir suggests. But what about our children? What can we do for our children? (16 min)

Article Club: An interview with Vann R. Newkirk II

The second best thing about Article Club — after you, the kind people who read and annotate and discuss thought-provoking articles every month — is that we get to hear from talented authors, who generously volunteer their time to participate.

That means that this month, we have the pleasure of listening to Vann R. Newkirk, the author of “When the Myth of Voter Fraud Comes for You.”

A few weeks ago, co-facilitator Sarai and I had the opportunity to interview Mr. Newkirk. It was an honor. Thanks to his thoughtfulness, it was a great conversation. We spoke about a number of topics, including how he approached writing the article, how it felt to meet Crystal Mason, why the Republican party is pursuing fake allegations of voter fraud, and what the impact those efforts have on our democracy.

Hope you enjoy the interview. Here it is. Go ahead and press play!

Note: If you click play from your email, it’ll open up to an online version of this post, and you’ll need to scroll back down here and press play again to listen.

Good news: There’s still time to join us in the discussion on Sunday, July 24, if you’re interested. Here’s a copy of the article for you to annotate. All you need to do is click the button below to sign up.

Sign up for our discussion!

2 More Great Articles For You

Last week’s lead article, “A Kingdom from Dust,” was a bit hit, despite its monstrous 89-minute reading time. I was pleasantly surprised. Thank you to loyal readers Lisa and Corinne and Tim and Lynn and others for sharing your thoughts about farming magnates Stewart and Lynda Resnick. As a bonus treat, here’s Ms. Resnick making a POMtini with Martha Stewart (starting at 4:35). “We invented this!” she says.

This week, here are a couple pieces I appreciated and encourage you to read:

How Instanbul Became the Global Capital of the Hair Transplant

By Alex Hawkins in GQ

Male celebrities like LeBron James, Ben Affleck, Bradley Cooper don’t go bald anymore. If you’re a man, why should you? And while you’re at it, why spend $20,000 to pay an American doctor to perform a hair transplant, also known as Follicular Unit Extraction, when you can travel to Istanbul and get one on the cheap? In this well-written travelogue, writer Alex Hawkins chronicles the nitty-gritty of his hair journey from start to end. Some tips: don’t draw your new hair line too low (it’s fake looking), don’t go outside after your surgery (you can’t let your head get wet), and don’t think you’re going sightseeing (you won’t leave your hotel). (18 min)

Breaking Off My Chemical Romance

By P.E. Moskowitz in The Nation

“There’s the familiar story we’ve been told about depression,” writes P.E. Moskowitz. “It’s caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain, that it’s a disease like diabetes and thus requires medication.” However, this story might be more marketing than medicine. Ever since the release of Prozac in 1986, scientists have not pinpointed how antidepressants work — or if they work demonstrably better than the placebo effect. As prescriptions continue to rise (now one-fifth of Americans take medication for mental health), especially among young people, more attention is being paid to the side effects of psychiatric drugs (e.g., brain zaps, sexual dysfunction, tardive dysphoria) and the difficulty many people face tapering off them. (21 min)

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Please feel free ALWAYS to give me feedback — especially over the next few months, as I iterate on and figure out this new newsletter format. All you need to do is hit reply, email me, or leave me a voice message.

Leave a voice message

To our three new subscribers – Karen, Jim, and Imène – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Rob! Rhoda! Ryan!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Deanna, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I appreciate your support. Look at these ways you can help out!

📬 Forward today’s issue to a friend and urge them to subscribe. If they use this sign-up form, they can say you referred them, and when I find out, I will shower you with thanks and praise (and maybe a prize).

☕️ Buy me a coffee to express your love of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month, like Lael and Kevin. You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#351: A Kingdom from Dust

Ever had a Cutie? 🍊

Or a bottle of Fiji water? Or a glass of pomegranate juice?

Maybe you prefer nuts — like maybe an almond? Or a pistachio, perhaps?

If you answered yes to any of those questions, you support the empire of billionaires Stewart and Lynda Resnick, the king and queen of California agriculture, who control not only hundreds of thousands of acres of land, but also billions of gallons of water every year, not to mention the livelihoods of thousands of mostly undocumented people who work in their vast fields and live in their company town, Lost Hills.

For that reason alone, I recommend that you read this week’s lead article, “A Kingdom from Dust,” a sweeping account that explores how two non-farming, kitsch-selling business people from the East coast built massive wealth by moving out west and making it big in California.

But if you’ve subscribed to this newsletter for any significant amount of time (hi there, long-time readers!), you know that I’m not going to include an 89-minute piece just because some folks struck it rich. (Except, of course, if they hacked the lottery – see “Jerry and Marge Go Large,” now a feel-good movie on Paramount+.)

No, it’s not that at all. Rather, I deeply appreciated this article because of what I learned about my home state – namely, how much power its big farmers wield, how little power its farmworkers possess, how messed up its water policies are, and how our desire for delicious produce in the supermarket is influencing climate change, contributing to wildfires, and literally making the land underneath our feet sink.

And on that delightful note, let’s get to the article! 😀 (I promise, it’s a good one.)

A Kingdom from Dust

If you asked me to introduce myself, I probably wouldn’t lead with “I’m Californian.” But the truth is I’ve lived here nearly all my life, and I don’t plan on moving anytime soon — no matter what Florida Governor Ron DeSantis says.

One big thing I’ve noticed about my California identity is that I remain mostly ignorant about the state’s history and economy. Sure, Miss Milanesio made us make a mission in fourth grade. But she certainly didn’t explain the nuances of water politics, or how agricultural barons transformed the land and exploited its people to extract a bounty of fruits and vegetables from the earth.

That’s why I’m grateful to journalist Mark Arax. His well-written article has it all. Not only will you meet Stewart and Lynda Resnick, but you’ll also learn about how they schemed their way to the top, stealing water to protect themselves from drought; how they built a company town, keeping their laborers dependent on philanthropy; and how they destroyed the environment, planting trees where they don’t grow and ripping out trees where they do.

And if you step back, as Mr. Arax encourages us to do, you’ll realize how fragile California is, and how dire our situation is — how we’ve managed to construct an enormous agricultural apparatus because of people’s ambitions for fortune, one that the country depends on, but one that fundamentally does not work, and one that will inevitably fail sooner rather than later.

After all, no matter how strong California dreaming is, there’s just no escaping the reality that 40 million people are living in a desert that’s getting drier.

+ No, despite what you’ve maybe seen on the web, and even though the Resnicks said so, pomegranate juice does not cure heart disease and erectile dysfunction.

This week at Article Club: Let’s annotate!

Last week, I revealed that we’ll be discussing “When the Myth of Voter Fraud Comes for You” on Sunday, July 24, 2:00 - 3:30 pm PT. This event will be free, on Zoom, and limited to 24 people. (Thank you to the 10 of you who have already signed up.) After a quick introduction, we’ll spend most of our time in small, facilitated discussion groups (5-7 people each).

There’s still time to join us if you’re interested. All you need to do is click the button below and sign up!

Sign up for our discussion!

This week, we’re annotating the article. Here’s a copy we can annotate together. Annotating is a great way to connect with other Article Clubbers and share your thoughts about the piece, right inside the text. You can build on others’ comments or add your own. Try it, you’ll like it!

If you’re new to our Article Club, welcome! We look forward to meeting you and having your voice in the conversation. Feel free to reach out with questions. Also, here’s what you can expect this month.

Coming up this month

  • This week: We’ll annotate the article and share our first impressions.

  • Thursday, July 14: We’ll listen to Mr. Newkirk’s thoughts on the article.

  • Sunday, July 24: We’ll discuss the article with fellow Article Clubbers.

Read The Highlighter Article Club in the Substack app

Available for iOS and Android

Get the app

1 More Great Article For You

Last week’s poll indicated that many of you resonated with Dave Eggers’s account of how and why his book was banned from a South Dakota school district. His story reminded me of the time when all the copies of Native Son were removed in the middle of the night from my first school’s book room. Sadly, book bans are on the rise and will likely continue. That’s why I’m on the hunt for articles about librarians and communities that are fighting back. Here’s one:

How Libraries Came To Be Sanctuaries for LGBTQ Kids

By Beth Hawkins in The 74 Million

Don’t believe the stereotype that librarians are staid introverts who like everything tidy and just so. In reality, the opposite is true, as this article profiling Michael McConnell reveals. Growing up in the 1940s and 1950s, Mr. McConnell visited the local library to understand his same-sex attraction. After he wasn’t successful, he dedicated his career as a librarian to curate books and safe spaces for queer youth. His activism intensified after the Stonewall Uprising in 1969. He married his partner in 1971 and helped to make the American Library Association the first professional group with a queer committee formally advocating for LGBTQ rights. Now 80 years old, Mr. McConnell laments the recent backlash and the widespread banning of Two Grooms on a Cake, a book about his life. But he’s happy that LGBTQ-related books remain the most stolen from school and public libraries. That means there’s demand, and that his life’s work continues to be meaningful.

+ Last year, nearly 1,600 books were challenged, according to the ALA. Many librarians fear for their lives. One said, “There were comments about library staff, calling us groomers and pedophiles and saying we needed to be fired, we need to be jailed, we needed to be locked up, that all the books needed to be burned.”

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Please feel free ALWAYS to give me feedback — especially over the next few months, as I iterate on and figure out this new newsletter format. All you need to do is hit reply, email me, or leave me a voice message.

To our three new subscribers – including Matthew and Ronald – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Quince! Querida! Quest!), you’re pretty great, too. VIP Sivan, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I appreciate your support. Look at these ways you can help out!

📬 Forward today’s issue to a friend and urge them to subscribe. If they use this sign-up form, they can say you referred them, and when I find out, I will shower you with thanks and praise (and maybe a prize).

☕️ Buy me a coffee to express your love of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month, like Jen and Loretta. You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#350: When the Myth of Voter Fraud Comes for You

Hi there, loyal readers, and welcome to the 350th issue of The Highlighter, the 100th issue of Article Club, and the first-ever issue of The Highlighter Article Club. I’m really happy you’re here.

Quick #storytime: Seven years ago, I started sharing my favorite articles on race, education, and culture in a weekly newsletter called The Highlighter. Many of you subscribed. Thank you! Then about two years ago, I launched another newsletter, called Article Club, that focused on discussing one outstanding article every month. Many of you subscribed. Thank you!

Everything’s been great with both publications, and I appreciate the community we’ve built in both spaces. But a few months ago, it dawned on me: Aren’t The Highlighter and Article Club sort of similar? Why do two things when one might be better?

So that’s what we’re going to do! Welcome to The Highlighter Article Club.

Our goals will be very familiar to you:

  • Let’s read the best articles on race, education, and culture

  • Let’s engage in thought-provoking ideas from a variety of perspectives

  • Let’s connect with other kind readers and build a thoughtful reading community

And away we go! I’m looking forward to seeing where our reading community will take us. Please feel free to reach out, say hello, and share your hopes.

In fact: Why don’t you do that right now — by leaving a comment below? I’d love to hear where you’re from, how you learned about The Highlighter or Article Club, why you’re a subscriber, and how you’d like our community to grow.

Leave a comment

Hey, thank you for doing that!

All right, now it’s time for the main event: revealing our article of the month. Ready?

When the Myth of Voter Fraud Comes For You

I’m pleased to announce that this month, we’ll be reading and discussing “When the Myth of Voter Fraud Comes for You,” by Vann R. Newkirk II. Originally published in The Atlantic last December, and featured in The Highlighter Issue #327, the article explores how far advocates of voter integrity will go to prosecute allegations of voter fraud — even when they don’t really exist.

Here’s my blurb:

You have a better chance of being struck by lightning twice than you do of committing voter fraud. Don’t tell that to Crystal Mason, sentenced for five years in prison for inadvertently casting an ineligible provisional ballot in Texas. Ms. Mason’s prosecution is part of a campaign led by purveyors of the Big Lie, who seek to disenfranchise Black and Latinx people using overt and subtle tactics of fear and intimidation. Author Vann R. Newkirk II writes, “Jim Crow was not imposed by a single stroke. It was built community by community, year by year, ruined life by ruined life, law by law, and lie by lie.” (20 min)

A senior editor at The Atlantic, Mr. Newkirk has covered the battles for voting rights since the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. Holder. He was also the host of Floodlines, a narrative podcast about Hurricane Katrina. Mr. Newkirk’s forthcoming book, Children of the Flood, a chronicle of Black America’s fight against climate crises, will be published by Random House.

Does the article sound interesting? If so, I urge you to read it, and if you appreciate it, I invite you to join me and others in our reading community to discuss the piece on Sunday, July 24, 2:00 - 3:30 pm PT. This event will be free, on Zoom, and limited to 24 people. After a quick introduction, we’ll spend most of our time in small, facilitated discussion groups (5-7 people each).

Are you IN?

I hope so! If so, click the button below to sign up. I’ll follow up with more information.

Sign up for our discussion!

If you’re new to our Article Club, welcome! We look forward to meeting you and having your voice in the conversation. Feel free to reach out with questions. Also, here’s what you can expect this month.

Coming up this month

  • This week: We’ll sign up for the discussion and start reading the article.

  • Next week: We’ll annotate the article and share our first impressions.

  • Thursday, July 14: We’ll listen to Mr. Newkirk’s thoughts on the article.

  • Sunday, July 24: We’ll discuss the article with fellow Article Clubbers.

3 More Great Articles

The point of this newsletter is not to inundate you with every single great article that I come across. That would be way too many. Rather, in addition to the main article, I’ll recommend just 1-3 more that I feel are worth your time and attention. I’d love to hear which ones resonate with you. Here’s what I found this week:

Lowell Freshmen Face Stigma Due to Lottery Admissions

If you’re not from the Bay Area, Lowell is the elite public high school in San Francisco that before last year admitted students based on “merit.” It’s like Stuyvesant in New York and Latin in Boston. Asian and white students are overrepresented; Black and Latinx students are underrepresented. After the murder of George Floyd and during the pandemic, the board of education rescinded that policy and began to admit students by lottery, like every other school in the district, in an effort to achieve greater equity. The percentage of Black and Latinx students rose. Then racist mayhem ensued. Reporting for their school newspaper, Kelcie Lee and Laura Reyes explain how both students and teachers bullied the more racially diverse new class of students, calling them “lottery kids” and suggesting they were inferior. (8 min)

+ The controversy engulfed the wider community as well. The Daily podcast devoted this episode to explore how the change in the admissions policy led San Francisco voters to oust three board members. Last week, the new board reversed course, reinstating the old admissions criteria.

Anatomy of a Book Banning

When author Dave Eggers found out that a South Dakota school district banned his book, The Circle, he decided to investigate. Among his findings: The school board president, who voted for the ban, has seven children, but none attend schools in the district. Another school board member, who also voted for the ban, was the treasurer of the Family Heritage Alliance and has no children attending the local schools. Most frustrating, though, was the effect on English teachers, many of whom left the district or substituted their regular curriculum for a safer alternative. One said, “I actually apologized to my students at the end of this school year, admitting to them that I didn’t think they got the best of me. I was teaching scared.” (15 min)

Suspending Belief: Abortion and the Right to Regret

“Abortion is hard to write about, hard for many even to talk about,” writes Dr. Christine Henneberg in this tender account, written before last week’s Supreme Court reversal of Roe v. Wade. In the piece, Dr. Henneberg explores her initial judgment when one of her patients shares her complicated feelings of regret after having an abortion. But after reflection, she writes, “Maybe it is simply their way of saying, in those tense, vulnerable moments, something that has nothing to do with politics, something entirely personal: I feel terrible about this. And I know I still need to do it. She may regret it afterwards, at least for a while, maybe even forever. I can still trust her to make her own decision, which no one else — not her boyfriend, not her doctor, not her governor — can make for her. That is, and should always be, her right, and her burden.” (16 min)

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Please feel free ALWAYS to give me feedback — especially this week and over the next few months, as I iterate on and figure out this new newsletter format.

#349: Time For A Change

Next Thursday marks the seventh anniversary of The Highlighter. Thank you all for reading my newsletter week after week. There’s no way I could have predicted seven years, but thanks to your enthusiasm and loyalty, well, here we are. It’s been a great journey so far.

As we approach Issue #350, I’m happy to announce some changes that I hope you’ll like. The Highlighter will merge with Article Club, my other reading-related newsletter, to become one publication.

Maybe you can guess the new name? Yep, you got it: It’s The Highlighter Article Club. 😀

The goals will remain the same:

  • to share the best articles on race, education, and culture

  • to offer thought-provoking ideas from a variety of perspectives

  • to encourage us to read, reflect, and connect more deeply

But a few things will be different. For example, there will be a greater emphasis on each issue’s lead article. I’d like us to get into it, reflect on it, and share our thoughts about it with one another. And I want to experiment with more ways for us to connect and build our reading community. After all, our world might be a slightly better place if we read more good things and then talked about them with other thoughtful people.

Here’s the best news: You don’t have to do anything. There won’t be any clicking or resubscribing or filling out a survey. You’ll receive next week’s issue next Thursday at 9:10 am PT like normal. Be on the lookout for it! especially if the email gods conspire and send it to promotions.

All right, that’s enough housekeeping. Let’s get into this week’s issue!

White Parents Chased A Black Educator Out Of Town. Then, They Followed Her to the Next One.

There are two parts to this story. The first is about Cecelia Lewis, an experienced and talented Black educator from New Jersey, who accepts a district job in suburban Georgia focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion, and who gets run out of town, twice, by angry, anti-CRT, anti-1619 Project white parents who don’t want a Black woman from the North having any authority over the education of their children.

The other part, though more subtle, is perhaps more powerful: This is also the story of well-meaning white educators in suburban Georgia (including the superintendent) who say they want change and more equity in their district, and who promise to support Ms. Lewis, but who then cave on their vows of allyship, taking the more comfortable route, leaving her vulnerable to attack. As a white educator who has not always lived up to my values, this is the part that spoke most to me. (34 min)

The Backlash Against Sex Ed

Parents against comprehensive sexuality education, or CSE, are by and large the same parents against CRT and The 1619 Project and SEL and trans kids in sports and instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity. The point is “to protect the innocence of children.” This article charts the rise of parents opting their children out of sex ed and the subsequent potential for violence. Author Joan Walsh compares the current parental rights movement to the QAnon cult and writes, “If you believe that LGBTQ teachers, or even straight sex-ed teachers, are ‘grooming’ children for sexual abuse, then violence can seem justified.” (22 min)

Finding Time For Life

Many of you have told me that you want to read more but can’t find the time. How do you do it? you ask. My answer is probably not one you want to hear: I’m way less busy than you are. But writer Anne Lamott’s answer is likely much more helpful. Whether your goal is to read more, or to write more, or to live life more, the key is simple: Don’t clean the house today. Skip the gym. Interrogate every last thing you find essential and see what you can let go of, at least once in a while. (4 min)

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter. Did you enjoy it? If so, give me a thumbs up below and tell me why. And if you didn’t like it, that’s OK, too – that’s what the thumbs down is for.

To our new subscriber Tamarah, I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Olga! Osvaldo! Otto!), you’re pretty great, too. VIP Corinne, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter, please help it grow. I appreciate your support. Word of mouth is how our reading community gets stronger. Here are a few ways you can help:

📬 Forward today’s issue to a friend and urge them to subscribe. If they use this sign-up form, they can say you referred them, and when I find out, I will shower you with thanks and praise (and maybe a prize).

☕️ Buy me a coffee to express your love of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month, like Reba and Nicole. You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#348: ‘Four Years Being Seen As Family’

Hi loyal readers! Thank you for being here. There’s plenty of doom out in the world right now – and plenty of pieces detailing that doom. If you’ve been a subscriber for any length of time, you know that I don’t shy away from doomsday articles. But this week – the beginning of a one-month break between jobs – I was in the mood for something different.

Today’s issue explores the theme of belonging from three perspectives. The lead article charts the rise of Black colleges and universities as joyful, safe, and transformative alternatives to predominantly white elite institutions. The second piece examines the controversial claims of Landmark Forum, which promises its participants breakthrough personal growth in just one three-day workshop. And the third article investigates whether belonging to a fantasy sports league is the answer to men’s inability to forge meaningful relationships. (Answer: No.) Please enjoy!

+ Program Note: After seven great years, I’m switching things up a bit. Beginning with Issue #350 on June 30, I’ll be merging The Highlighter with Article Club, my other reading-related newsletter. I’ll share more next week about why I’m excited about this shift, but for now, here’s a quick summary of what to expect:

  • You don’t have to do anything

  • You’ll keep getting issues every Thursday at 9:10 am

  • There will be new features that I think you’ll like

Please let me know if you have questions. Thank you and I hope you have a great weekend coming up.

Why Students Are Choosing H.B.C.U.s: ‘Four Years Being Seen as Family’

Erica L. Green: “The nation’s H.B.C.U.s have experienced a boom. From 2018 to 2021, applications for a cross section of Black schools increased nearly 30 percent, according to the Common App, a platform for students to submit one application to multiple colleges, outpacing the increases of many other schools. Submissions using the Common Black College Application, solely for H.B.C.U.s., are projected to reach 40,000 this year, quadruple the total in 2016. And enrollment has soared at some of the schools, even as it declined nationally.

“ ‘College is the time when you’re trying to figure out who you are,’ said SeKai Parker, who chose Spelman over Yale. ‘It’s impossible to figure that out in a space where you not only feel like you have to assimilate to fit into that space, when they didn’t invite you there or they tolerate you there, but you have to prove that your existence has value.’ ” (21 min)

+ Big thanks to VIP Sivan for sending this article my way. Want to nominate an article or podcast? Please do!

The Landmark Forum: A Program For Personal Transformation, Or A Cult?

I’m always looking for ways to improve my life. That is why I got close to attending a Landmark Forum event years ago when a good friend assured me that the experience would lead to transformative personal growth. Good thing I declined. This outstanding podcast (especially Parts 1 and 3) describes the allure (and cultiness) of Landmark, its questionable history (as an outgrowth of est), its problematic premise (that we’re 100% in charge of our destinies), and its enduring impact in corporate culture and discourse. Even if you’re not a habitual podcast listener, try this one, you’ll like it (49 min).

+ Big thanks to VIP Jessica for the referral.

Can Men Be Friends? My Life in Fantasy Basketball.

In seventh grade I convinced (i.e., forced) my friends to join a fantasy baseball league with me. (I was in charge of the statistics, and yes, there was a weekly newsletter. Girls weren’t allowed.) The experience led to years of mirth – or at least we thought so, being teenage boys. But this thoughtful piece by Zak Cheney-Rice got me thinking: Did I found the league as a last-bastion effort to maintain the childhood friendships threatened by the entropic forces of middle school? Surely Mr. Cheney-Rice would agree with my analysis, except in this well-written piece, he cares more about whether straight men in their 30s can be friends (particularly if they have lives), or if fantasy sports serve as a crutch for intimacy. (19 min)

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter. Did you enjoy it? If so, give me a thumbs up below and tell me why. And if you didn’t like it, that’s OK, too – that’s what the thumbs down is for.

To our five new subscribers – Giuseppina, Bobby, Martha, Mark, and Willie – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Nora! Nancy! Nathalie!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Jillian, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter, please help it grow. I appreciate your support. Word of mouth is how our reading community gets stronger. Here are a few ways you can help:

📬 Forward today’s issue to a friend and urge them to subscribe. If they use this sign-up form, they can say you referred them, and when I find out, I will shower you with thanks and praise (and maybe a prize).

☕️ Buy me a coffee (or two, like Elizabeth! thanks Elizabeth!) to express your love of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month, like Kibos and Dave. You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#347: The End of Equity

For many people, the summer protests of 2020 following the murder of George Floyd felt like a real chance for change. Ibram X. Kendi called for antiracism. Michelle Alexander called for the defunding of the police. Nikole Hannah-Jones called for reparations. There was a reckoning. There was a moment of possibility.

We all know what happened next: a global pandemic, a big lie, an insurrection, a backlash to The 1619 Project and critical race theory, book bans, anti-trans laws, and an upcoming Supreme Court decision. For some of us, this is a step backward. But for others – like San Francisco voters, who recalled progressive prosecutor Chesa Boudin, and Los Angeles voters, who backed pro-police mayoral candidate Rick Caruso – this is a desirable correction to increased crime and failed leftist policies.

Today’s issue of The Highlighter includes two articles on both sides of the divide. The lead piece, “Equality ≠ Equity,” may surprise many of you who have come to expect a social justice bent to this newsletter. Author Tal Fortgang argues that seeking equity, or the equality of outcomes, does not represent Americans’ notions of fairness. Checking privilege is one thing; sacrificing privilege is another. I encourage you to read the article, especially if you think you’ll disagree, like I did.

If you’re an educator, like many of you are, don’t read the second article, which profiles a gay teacher in Florida who resigned after the state passed the Don’t Say Gay law. It’s infuriating. Instead, take in the beautiful photo of Yosemite and head straight down to the last two pieces – about large-scale cheating in a college course and about promoting empathy and compassion among doctors. Please enjoy!

+ Want to read more, read more deeply, and connect with other thoughtful people? Check out Article Club. This month, we’re reading “The Roe Baby,” by Joshua Prager. Here’s more information. We’re meeting June 26.

Equality ≠ Equity

Conservative law student Tal Fortgang believes at least two things are wrong with the progressive goal of equity, or common outcomes. First, notions of equality are too deeply rooted in American culture that seeking equity comes across as unfair. Equally as important, Mr. Fortang argues, Democratic leaders have hedged, not going all in on equity, afraid to be upfront with the American people on the true definition of equity for fear of losing the upcoming election. Besides, Americans like the idea of “equal opportunity.” But equity? That’s socialist. (14 min)

A Florida Teacher Felt She Had To Quit Amid “Don’t Say Gay” Rhetoric

Up until this year, Nicolette Solomon taught fourth graders in Key Biscayne, Florida, with boundless joy. She was good, too – nominated teacher of the year. Then came HB 1557, dubbed the “Don’t Say Gay” law, which emboldened Ms. Solomon’s colleagues to explain that being gay is against God’s rules and that she should not be teaching young children. One said, “I like you as a person, but I don’t support gay marriage.” Even though she loved the kids, Ms. Solomon decided she couldn’t work at a school if she couldn’t wear her wedding ring. (20 min)

My Students Cheated. A Lot.

Matthew Crump teaches psychology at the Brooklyn College of CUNY. He wants the best for his students – even when they cheat. This is Prof. Crump’s account of last semester’s class, in which many of his students cheated (via a group chat), how much they cheated (a lot), and how well they cheated (they didn’t know Prof. Crump was also on the group chat). What could easily be a gossipy gotcha story turns out to be a tale of redemption, thanks to Prof. Crump’s empathy and desire to improve as an educator. (He’s also pretty good at the programming language R.) (48 min)

Bad News 101: Empathy Training Helps Medical Students Sit With Uncertainty

It’s not a secret that medical students spend most of their time learning about anatomy and diseases and very little time learning about how to interact with people. That’s why Meg Senuta volunteers as a mock cancer patient and participates in role plays with medical students practicing how to deliver bad news. Why does she do it? She’s a cancer survivor herself. “I’m still figuring out how to live with uncertainty and fear. I am still figuring out what happened to me,” she writes. “How to make use of it. Not meaning, but use.” (17 min)

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter. Did you enjoy it? If so, give me a thumbs up below and tell me why. And if you didn’t like it, that’s OK, too – that’s what the thumbs down is for.

To our four new subscribers – Mohamed, Courte, Mohamed, and Janet – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Mona! Maureen! Mike!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Francisco, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter, please help it grow. I appreciate your support. Word of mouth is how our reading community gets stronger. Here are a few ways you can help:

📬 Forward today’s issue to a friend and urge them to subscribe. If they use this sign-up form, they can say you referred them, and when I find out, I will shower you with thanks and praise (and maybe a prize).

☕️ Buy me a coffee (or two, like Beth! thanks Beth!) to express your love of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month. You’ll join an esteemed group of generous readers who value the mission of The Highlighter.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#346: What Bullets Do To Bodies

Dear Loyal Readers,

More than 30 of you reached out with kind, thoughtful words after last week’s issue. Thank you. I’ll keep what you said private, but please know that I’m grateful for your messages of care. I’m proud and appreciative of the reading community we have built here over the last seven years, and I look forward to continuing to grow alongside you.

Choosing this week’s articles was challenging. Should I look for pieces on gun violence or steer clear of the topic? Besides offering the best articles on race, education, and culture, what’s the deeper purpose of the newsletter in the first place? After some reflection, I did what I do: Read, and then read some more, seeking to find pieces that are well written, thought provoking, from a range of publications, and generous in spirit.

Today’s lead article, “What Bullets Do To Bodies,” profiles Dr. Amy Goldberg, a heroic trauma surgeon who bluntly states that the only way our country will change its mind on guns is if we are shown the autopsy photos of dead children. The second piece offers evidence to the claim that a “good guy with a gun” is not going to stop a “bad guy with a gun.” If the idea of reading those articles is too upsetting, skip to the last two selections – one about the vitriolic reading wars and the other about a woman who wanted an abortion before Roe v. Wade.

My hope is that you’ll find at least one article worthy of your time and attention. Thank you for reading The Highlighter. Please have a good week.

Thank you,

Mark

P.S. Tonight’s Highlighter Happy Hour is sold out! If you didn’t get your free ticket this time, join us at our next one on Thursday, Aug. 4.

What Bullets Do To Bodies

From 2017, but still very relevant: Dr. Amy Goldberg has been a surgeon in the trauma unit at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia for the past 30 years. Her life’s work is to save people from dying from gun violence. If we knew what bullets do to bodies, Dr. Goldberg says, we would change our minds about our right to bear arms. The problem, of course, is that many people, even after Uvalde, have decided that gun violence is not a real problem, that it affects only people of color in cities.

+ I originally featured this article in Issue #91. Investigative reporter Jason Fagone, who has written about lotteries and artificial intelligence and white supremacists, joined us at Article Club in 2020 and is one of my favorite writers.

During Parkland, One Of The Deadliest School Shootings, Armed Officer Scot Peterson Stood Outside. Why?

I read this article the weekend before the Uvalde massacre and expected a measured profile that offered the subject empathy with his decision not to engage the shooter at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland. Not so. Author Eric Barton doesn’t directly accuse deputy sheriff Scot Peterson of negligence but allows him to condemn himself with extended rationalizations and general gobbledygook. Mr. Peterson talks and talks but makes very little sense. (25 min)

A Reading Guru Defers To The Science Of Reading

Several of you sent me this article (thank you!) asking for my two cents. Here they are: By all means, let’s teach reading according to what the research says is right. And let’s make sure all teachers have access to best practices. But there’s no need to trash Lucy Calkins or other experts who have devoted their careers to support young people’s reading development. Saying “the science of reading” again and again to attack your opponents (and capitalizing it, and abbreviating it SoR) won’t magically make our students read better. It’s doing the work with students that makes the difference. (10 min)

+ Listen to my 2018 interview with Emily Hanford, the journalist who first attacked Ms. Calkins and whose documentaries popularized the science of reading movement.

Before Roe, A Florida Woman Was Prosecuted For Getting An Abortion. Her Story Sparked A Movement.

It’s June, which means the Supreme Court’s monumental decision to ban abortion is just a few weeks away. Yesterday I listened to the first episode of this season’s Slow Burn podcast, which focuses on the story of Shirley Wheeler, a 22-year-old woman who was convicted of manslaughter for obtaining an illegal abortion in 1970.

+ This month at Article Club, we’re reading and discussing “The Roe Baby,” featured in Issue #311. Our conversation will be on Sunday, June 26. Let me know if you’d like to participate.

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter. Did you enjoy it? If so, give me a thumbs up below and tell me why. And if you didn’t like it, that’s OK, too – that’s what the thumbs down is for.

To our two new subscribers Jordan and Courtney – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Nancy! Nick! Nora!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Bill, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter, please help it grow. I appreciate your support. Word of mouth is how our reading community gets stronger. Here are a few ways you can help:

📬 Forward today’s issue to a friend and urge them to subscribe. If they use this sign-up form, they can say you referred them, and when I find out, I will shower you with thanks and praise (and maybe a prize).

☕️ Buy me a coffee (or many!) to express your love of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month. You’ll join an esteemed group of generous readers who value the mission of The Highlighter.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#345: The Children

Dear Loyal Readers,

Usually reading brings me comfort. It brings me solace. It brings me clarity. That’s why I’ve been sharing this newsletter with you for almost 7 years.

But not this week. Not after the massacre in Texas.

Right now it doesn’t make sense to publish the articles I’d originally selected for today’s issue. It also doesn’t make sense to share pieces about the shooting, or about gun violence in general, or about how we must act even though we feel helpless and hopeless.

Right now all I want to do is honor the 19 children and two teachers who were murdered inside a fourth grade classroom on Tuesday.

Their names are Uziyah Garcia, Amerie Garza, Xavier Lopez, Tess Mata, Ellie Garcia, Rojelio Torres, Jose Flores, Jailah Silguero, Jayce Luevanos, Nevaeh Bravo, Jackie Cazares, Annabelle Rodriguez, Eliahana Torres, Makenna Lee Elrod, Lexi Rubio, Alithia Ramirez, Miranda Mathis, Maite Yuleana, Layla Salazar, teacher Eva Mireles, and teacher Irma Garcia.

They died after the morning’s honor roll awards ceremony.

Loyal readers, I’ll be back next Thursday. Maybe by then I will have connected with some of you and processed some of my emotions. Maybe by then there will be something to read that will help us move forward.

If you’d like to reach out, please do. I’d appreciate it.

Thank you for being part of this reading community,

Mark

#344: Losing Weight Didn't Mean Winning

Happy Thursday, loyal readers. Thank you for being here.

This week’s issue focuses on the body. As someone who grew up chubby and lost and gained weight multiple times in adulthood, it’s a topic that has always fascinated me. I still get flummoxed in meetings and education workshops, for example, when the facilitator prompts us to “check in with our bodies” or asks us “where in our bodies” we’re feeling stress. No idea! my brain replies, acknowledging the outcome of many years of mind-body disassociation.

But this week’s articles have been helpful, and I hope that you appreciate them, too. I found the lead piece, “I’ve Always Struggled With My Weight. Losing It Didn’t Mean Winning,” extremely relatable all the way through to the last paragraph, where the author discusses his favorite breakfast. The second and third articles – about fatphobia and running shirtless – are also excellent. If reading about the body causes you anxiety, feel free to skip to the last article, a feel-good story about a shy boy who loves baseball.

+ If you’d like to read more about body positivity and fat shaming, here’s a collection of articles that I published a few years back.

🎉 🎈Come celebrate summer at Highlighter Happy Hour #17! We’ll meet on Thursday, June 2 beginning at 5:30 pm at Room 389 in Oakland. Space is limited to 20 people. Get your free ticket here. HHH is a great way to hang out with other kind, thoughtful people. Plus there’s always a prize. 🏆

🗞 📖 Over at Article Club, I’m happy to announce that we’ll be discussing three outstanding articles this summer. Hit reply if you’re interested.

As always, I hope that you find at least one article worthy of your time and attention, and I wish you a restful weekend coming up. Please enjoy!

I’ve Always Struggled With My Weight. Losing It Didn’t Mean Winning.

Like many of us, Sam Anderson gained weight during the pandemic. It wasn’t his first time. He’s struggled with his weight his whole life. But when a friend mocks him, and when he can’t fit into a pair of shorts on a vacation, Mr. Anderson decides to sign up for Noom, a weight loss app. The pounds fly off. He’s trim again. He can fit into old pants and his favorite T-shirts. He’s a success story. But when he reflects on how he feels, he notices: “I felt pretty much exactly as I had always felt my whole entire life. I was, after all that change, still only myself.”

Even if you’ve never subjected yourself to a diet, you’ll appreciate Mr. Anderson’s funny and incisive writing. My favorite part comes toward the beginning, when he considers the relationship he has with his body:

What is the human relationship to the body? Is it like a roommate? A pet? A twin? A teammate? A rival? A parasite? A host? Is the body our essential self, or is it just an outer shell — and if so, is it more like a clam shell (homegrown, enduring) or a hermit crab shell (adopted, temporary)? Is it closer to a tamale husk or a hot dog bun or a pita pocket or the fluorescent cake-tube that wraps a Twinkie’s sweet cream center?

The piece gets serious and contemplative, too, exploring his childhood and his alter ego and his father, but instead of giving too much of it away, I recommend that you read it! (20 min)

+ Mr. Anderson also wrote “A Mother and Daughter at the End,” about the last two northern white rhinos on Earth, which appeared in Issue #276. It’s one of loyal reader Xuan-Vu’s favorite articles.

Dismantling Medical Fatphobia: The Big Fat Loophole in the Hippocratic Oath

Marquisele Mercedes, on how science and the medical field have contributed to fatphobia: “Weight stigma means being paid less at work and being penalized in the classroom. ‘Weight stigma’ is relentless. It means overt and tacit bullying – being mooed at while walking, coworkers not meeting your gaze, little ‘hints’ and ‘tips’ that remind you your eating is being surveilled by friends and family. Constant exposure to special reports about how people like you are draining the nation’s coffers, ruining the world for future generations. ‘Weight stigma’ is constant: unending reminders that the people around you wish you weren’t you, pressure to starve yourself. Knowing that the more you undo your existence, the more you’ll be rewarded.” (27 min)

On Running Shirtless While Trans

Vivian Lam loves running shirtless. “I don’t think I’ve ever felt more comfortable in my own skin as a trans person,” they write. But they prefer to run at 4 am, when “the streets are at their most forgiving,” when “there’s a hushed kind of quiet.” After all, they acknowledge, safety is conditional. In this thoughtful essay, Lam explores the lessons they learned from their first-generation Chinese mother: that “girls stay covered” and “Asian people avoid conflict.” But in the end, they’re tired of hiding and being afraid. They finally can recognize themself in the mirror. And they feel exhilarated running shirtless. (11 min)

The 11-Year-Old Yankees Fan Who Lost His Autographed Baseball Cards

You can tell me baseball is boring, that nobody cares about it anymore (evidence: Oakland A’s), that’s it’s a dying sport. But if you read this article about 11-year-old Elyjah Blankenberg, a shy and softspoken boy who loves baseball and baseball cards and summoning the courage to ask his favorite baseball players for autographs, you’ll have a change of heart. Get ready for a coming-of-age story, filled with sap and nostalgia, of a boy who loses his memorabilia collection, then finds something more important. (20 min)

+ Reader Annotations: Last week’s lead article, “What is Vital To Your Survival,” sparked strong emotions and many thoughtful reponses. Thank you for sharing them. I was particularly appreciative of loyal reader Steph and her powerful contribution. She writes:

Roe v. Wade has been the law of the land for my entire life; it’s never been something I consciously took for granted, but now I realize that I did, in fact, take for granted that it would never be overturned. That was a mistake. The fact that a legal medical procedure has never been uniformly and fairly available to anyone who needs it in this country is an embarrassment. But now things are even worse, with bounty laws popping up in different states and trigger laws set to enact as soon as the Supreme Court invalidates Roe v. Wade. Intellectually, I know there are many injustices in this country that need attention. But I can’t imagine physically going to battle for any of them except reproductive rights. (Actually, add voting rights and reform to my list too). The erosion of both of those has me ready to fight; I feel a visceral sadness when I read and witness accounts of politicians and other people in positions of power attempting to strip others of their ability to make choices for themselves, at the ballot box and for their own bodies.

I am very grateful that you shared what you would fight for, Steph. Loyal readers, if one of this week’s articles resonated with you, go ahead and tap the “r” key on your keyboard and tell me why it moved you. It would be an honor to hear from you.

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter. Did you enjoy it? If so, give me a thumbs up below and tell me why. And if you didn’t like it, that’s OK, too – that’s what the thumbs down is for.

To our two new subscribers Thomas and Taney – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Maurice! Melanie! Mona!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Erin, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter, please help it grow. I appreciate your support. Word of mouth is how our reading community gets stronger. Here are a few ways you can help:

📬 Forward today’s issue to a friend and urge them to subscribe. If they use this sign-up form, they can say you referred them, and when I find out, I will shower you with thanks and praise (and maybe a prize).

☕️ Be like VIP Irene and buy me a coffee (or many!) to keep my energy up

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month. You’ll join an esteemed group of generous readers who value the mission of The Highlighter.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.

#343: What Is Vital To Your Survival?

Loyal readers, thank you for being here.

I believe deeply in the power of reading for personal and collective transformation. Since February, I’ve been leading a book club focusing on The 1619 Project for a group of thoughtful people, including many of you. We’ve been reading slowly, just one essay a week, because the work demands our deep focus. It has been an honor to discuss the book in community. At the end of our last session, a co-facilitator recommended an article to support our process of converting our learning and reflection to action. Titled “What Is Vital To Your Survival?” it’s this week’s lead article. It’s by Ijeoma Oluo, it’s excellent, and I urge you to read it.

As we approach the second anniversary of the murder of George Floyd, I’ve also included an excerpt from His Name Is George Floyd, a forthcoming book by Robert Samuels and Toluse Olorunnipa. In “How George Floyd Spent His Final Hours,” the authors capture Mr. Floyd’s personality, profile his friends, and reveal his hopes and challenges.

My hope is that you’ll find one or both of this week’s pieces worthy of your time and attention. If you do, let me know. I’d love to hear from you. You can hit reply or leave a voice message.

What Is Vital To Your Survival?

Ijeoma Oluo: “It’s quite easy to say that you believe in reproductive justice. It’s easy to say that you think racism is wrong. It’s easy for you to say that you believe in freedom and equality. But what we say and what we do are two very different things. What is vital to your survival?

“That’s not a question to blurt out an answer to. I want you to think for a moment. When I ask you what is vital to your survival, I am not asking you to give me what your intellect knows. I’m asking you to give me what your body knows, what the deepest parts of your brain knows.

“What has you ready to fight? What has you arming yourself spiritually, intellectually, even physically? What would make you scream? What would you claw and tear for? What would you battle others for?” (11 min)

+ What’s your answer to Ms. Oluo’s question? Hit reply if you’d like to share your thoughts, and I’ll publish them in next week’s newsletter.

How George Floyd Spent His Final Hours

Robert Samuels and Toluse Olorunnipa: “ ’I love you.’ Floyd would express the same sentiment to men, women and children; to relatives, old friends and strangers; to romantic partners, platonic acquaintances and the women who fell somewhere in between; to hardened hustlers and homeless junkies; to big-time celebrities and neighborhood nobodies. He said the phrase so often that many friends and family members have no doubt about the final words he spoke to them. He would end phone calls with the expression and sign off text messages by tapping it out in all caps. On that fateful Memorial Day, as he suffocated under Officer Derek Chauvin’s knee, Floyd spent his dying breaths calling out the same phrase. ‘Mama, I love you!’ he screamed from the pavement, where his cries of ‘I can’t breathe’ were met with an indifference as deadly as hate.” (25 min)

+ Mr. Samuels and Mr. Olorunnipa are the authors of the new book, His Name Is George Floyd: One Man’s Life And The Struggle For Racial Justice.

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter. Did you enjoy it? If so, give me a thumbs up below and tell me why. And if you didn’t like it, that’s OK, too – that’s what the thumbs down is for.

To our two new subscribers Amy and Bek – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Lam! Laura! Larry!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Jon, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter, please help it grow. I appreciate your support. Word of mouth is how our reading community gets stronger. Here are a few ways you can help:

📬 Forward today’s issue to a friend and urge them to subscribe. If they use this sign-up form, they can say you referred them, and when I find out, I will shower you with thanks and praise (and maybe a prize).

☕️ Buy me a coffee (or many!) to express your love of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month. You’ll join an esteemed group of generous readers who value the mission of The Highlighter.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT.